Hundreds of pages, and every row has to stand up

Insolvency cases and forensic reviews mean reconstructing account activity from statement PDFs at volume, under scrutiny, on a case budget. This is the workload that breaks page-quota tools.

The shape of the work

  • Cases arrive with hundreds of statement pages at once; practitioners describe 700 pages across two cases in a week, then nothing for a month.
  • Findings feed reports that opposing parties and courts will pick at; a missing transaction is not an inconvenience, it is a hole in the evidence.
  • Engagements are time-boxed, so an annual software subscription for a six-week case is dead cost.
  • Source documents are confidential and often subject to strict handling terms.

How the converter fits it

  • Per-document pricing, not per-page: a 60-page statement is one credit, and 50 credits cost £29 with no expiry between cases.
  • Verification is the point: every document either reconciles to the penny against its own printed balances or is flagged, row by row, which is the standard reconstruction work is held to anyway.
  • Browser-local processing means case documents never touch a third-party server, a sentence your engagement letter will appreciate.
  • Unlimited free previews let you triage a document pile before spending anything.

What it will not do for you

  • Older statements from legacy layouts, and any scanned pages, will be refused; volume cases usually contain both, so pair this with an OCR route for the scans and treat those rows with the suspicion they deserve.
  • Seven certified banks; historic or defunct-bank statements are outside certification.
  • No entity matching, tracing, or analysis; this produces verified raw rows for your own tooling.

Guides for this work

Questions insolvency & forensic ask